USA-Panama: Post-Match Thoughts & Highlights
The USMNT’s January camp closed out with a second 1-0 win on Wednesday night, albeit with a lot fewer of the bright moments and dominating play that we saw against Venezuela.
Instead of the same controlling 4-3-3 that dictated the match in Glendale, we saw a scattered 4-4-2 and sloppy play throughout the lineup. It was, result aside, a step back for most that left a lot to be desired.
But before we delve into the bad, let’s first look at some of the good.
Nick Rimando, earning the fifth cap of his career, made a couple of stellar stops in his 45 minutes of play that preserved the USMNT’s 1-0 lead. Sure, he nearly got caught when he missed the ball on an aggressive rush off his line, but that’s far outweighed by the stunning one hand stop he made on a shot that was already past him, plus the scrambling clearance that followed. Not a lot of positions came out of the January camp having generally succeeded in both matches, but the goalkeeping corps (albeit without a ton asked of them) got the job done very well.
Another good thing to see was the international debut of Jeff Parke, who came on after the Geoff Cameron red card. As I’ve said time and time again, it’s always a special thing for a player to earn his first cap, so it was great to see the Drexel product get his shot with the Yanks. In his debut, Parke was solid (save for one gaffe that led to a shocking Panama miss from close range), helping the back line weather the storm after the US were reduced to 10 men.
Similarly, a first international goal is always special, so it was neat to see Graham Zusi find the back of the net in an otherwise decent but unremarkable appearance.
Well, that’s pretty much it for the good, unfortunately. Slim pickins in Panama City.
In general, many players had off nights. Brek Shea wasn’t particularly effective going forward, Jermaine Jones and Ricardo Clark didn’t exactly wow in the center of the park (so much for the snowball effect for Rico following that Venezuela goal), and Teal Bunbury turned in another underwhelming performance.
The center backs got beaten over the top on several occasions, and Cameron’s night ended in undesirable fashion with his second half red card (there's some debate as to whether or not he made contact, but it looked like he clipped Blas Perez to me, and once that call was made in that spot, the red card wasn't really a surprise). Playing a high line, the duo looked far less comfortable than they did against Venezuela, with Panama attackers finding space behind and threatening goal a number of times. Though, it must be said for them and for others, the squad’s tactics on the night worked to their detriment.
That, of course, falls on the shoulders of one Jurgen Klinsmann.
I said in my preview piece that one strong tactical performance against Venezuela was nice, but I wanted to see Klinsi replicate that success on the road against a tougher opponent. Well, he fell short of that by a decent margin.
Instead of continuing on with the 4-3-3 that was so successful in controlling possession and generating quality scoring opportunities, Klinsmann opted for rather defensive, dare-I-say Bradley-esque tactics with a 4-4-2 of the “empty bucket” variety. With two defensive-minded midfielders, a gap between the strikers and midfielders emerged, leading to a general disconnect within the US attack.
Forwards weren’t often provided great service or support, while the midfield was lost at times at both ends of the field, failing to command the game against a Panama team that was, apart from some veterans, pretty young and inexperienced.
Moreover, without a pressing midfield and front line controlling the match, the high back line that was employed was exposed on multiple occasions with simple probing balls over the top, as the Panama midfield had enough time on the ball to drop passes behind Parkhurst and Cameron. Once again, it could be argued that there was a lack of coherence between tactics and personnel, as Parkhurst and Cameron struggled to hold the high line at times against a Panamanian front line that included Blas Perez.
But most importantly, it seemed to show a lack of coherence between elements of Klinsmann’s larger tactical plan. A high back line coupled with a deep-lying midfield that concedes a decent bit of possession just by the nature of its positioning creates a situation in which space exists both for opposing midfielders to possess the ball, and for opposing forwards to run in behind the defense.
Granted, it did not cost the Yanks in the form of a goal, but there were a number of close calls that easily could have wiped away the US win.
The formation also did few favors for the forwards trying to impress. Chris Wondolowski, while not spectacular, did do well all things considered (mainly the lack of consistent service and support), helping set up Zusi’s goal with a nice flick-on header to get the ball into a dangerous spot. Wondo was also agonizingly unlucky not to score his first international goal, getting absolutely robbed after smartly following the rebound after a bullet from distance by Jermaine Jones.
Did he do enough to merit a call into the Italy camp or at least keep himself on Klinsi’s radar heading into World Cup qualification? I certainly don’t think he hurt his case across the two matches, and I wonder how much Klinsmann will take his own tactical missteps – which hampered the play of many Yanks – into consideration when evaluating the Panama performances, though. Ultimately, a lot will likely depend on what happens with other forwards in the pool, several of whom have a little bit of a leg up as is, being part of Klinsmann's "A-team". And, of course, we aren’t able to see what goes on in all of camp, which very well could impact any decision that is made.
While Wondo was okay – the lack of a connection between the forwards and the midfield limited the effectiveness of those in the front six – Teal Bunbury capped off the January camp with an uninspiring performance. Perhaps it’s a lack of match fitness and sharpness that will come back once the MLS season is underway, but Bunbury looked far from a player capable of breaking into the full team in the coming months.
Do I think any of the guys who haven’t featured with the full team in the past handful of months have a shot at getting called into the Italy camp, now that the January camp is over? Cameron, while not overly impressive against Panama, still seems like someone who could get called in because he resembles the type of skilled center back Klinsmann has been looking for. Do I think that Cameron is capable of filling that role? Eh, it’s hard to say at this point, but Klinsmann’s desire for that type of defender led us to several agonizing appearances from Michael Orozco Fiscal, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Klinsi takes a flier on Cameron in February. Realistically, though, I think that would probably wait until the summer.
Benny Feilhaber’s absence was curious after a solid outing v. Venezuela. Was it perhaps the result of being a little banged up after a long camp? Or was instead an indication that Benny is further down on the totem pole?
Ultimately, I expect the Italy camp to be the usual suspects, with few from this January camp getting the invite.
---
All of that aside, it must be said that the Yanks still prevailed on the road in Central America, something that is never easy to do. In the end, it’s good for the players, as well as Klinsmann and his staff, to get that experience ahead of World Cup qualification, where a trip to Guatemala (and likely other Central American destinations) awaits.
I guess it’s just a sign of higher expectations that even a 1-0 road win by a B-team is still met with some consternation stateside.
On to February we go…

